With all this talk recently of the SEC investigation of Goldman Sachs and the federal government pushing for finance reform, I think it'd be nice to review why the housing bubble and subsequent bust happened.
It sort of begs the question, why would banks, recently, start lending to people that shouldn't qualify for loans? This has never happened before. Growing up, my parents told me that I would have to save 20% before I could afford to apply for a mortgage. It made sense and if I should try to do otherwise, the banks would rightfully laugh in my face. I mean, why would a bank lend to someone who couldn't or wouldn't be able to pay them back?
The problem comes from the federal government (of course). During the Carter administration "the Community Reinvestment Act (or CRA,
Pub.L. 95-128, title VIII, 91 Stat. 1147, 12 U.S.C. § 2901
et seq.) is a United States federal law that requires banks
and savings and loan associations to offer credit throughout their
entire market area and prohibits them from targeting only wealthier
neighborhoods with their services, a practice known as "redlining." The
purpose of the CRA is to provide credit, including home ownership
opportunities to underserved populations and commercial loans to small
businesses."* Further, under the Clinton administration, in 1995, his "...strategy to "deal with the problems of the inner
city and distressed rural communities"** resulted in the regulatory changes of 1995 and the setup for the boom and bust.
This should serve as a reminder that there are unintended consequences to many laws. Often, the best thing to do is nothing and let the people and the economy fix themselves.
* http://money.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977461051
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#Regulatory_changes_1995
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let me hear what you think.